News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Circus angered by ban 

Circus angered by ban

28/05/2008 3:53:00 PM
THE owner of Stardust and Lennon Bros circuses said councillors should have consulted the community before imposing a ban on all circuses with elephants or big cats.

Jan Lennon said Camden Council should also have talked to the circus industry instead of relying solely on the argument from the RSPCA before making a decision.

At its meeting on May 13, councillors voted 6-3 to impose the ban.

"The circus industry wasn't even notified that anything like this was going to happen so we had no representation there,'' Mrs Lennon told the Advertiser.

The Stardust and Lennon Bros circuses use lions and monkeys in their shows, and up until January this year had an elephant as part of the act.

Mrs Lennon said the circus business was better than ever which was a sign that people did not object to the use of the animals.

"These cats are not born in the wild and all of a sudden handled by people,'' she said.

"Yes, they're still wild animals of course, but they're more domesticated than wild.''

But Larry Murphy from Animal Liberation NSW said circus animals were forced to do pointless tricks that were contrary to their behaviour.

"There is no educational benefit nor conservation,'' he said.

"It is simply exploitation disguising itself as entertainment.

"Circuses teach children that animals are there to be laughed at, be used however we see fit and are there for our amusement.''

Councillor Eva Campbell, who moved the motion for the ban, said her decision was based on information from two zoos, the RSPCA and her general knowledge.

"Any decision that the council makes is never actually set in tablets of stone,'' she said.

"If there is a change in the future or if we have made some sort of omission or error, that can be further addressed.'' Cr Campbell said she would be happy to hear Mrs Lennon's case if she wanted to put it to the councillors.

What do you think?

Have your say on our website or email abowie@fairfaxmedia.com.au.

Send to a Friend
Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

Comments


Why should councillors be able to make decisions like this for the public??? Common sense would suggest that people should be able to have animals in circuses if they want to see them. Obviously if people weren't happy with animals in circuses and weren't going then the circus wouldn't visit that town again!!! WHY RUIN IT FOR EVERYONE CR CAMPBELL???
Posted by Darren on 28/05/2008 5:58:24 PM
In response to Darren, there are a lot of things that are popular that are nonetheless deemed socially unacceptable and therefore outlawed (from child pornography to washing your car with a hose). Isn't the question whether it's right or wrong, not whether people would go along with it if it was allowed? We just might need more information to decide whether or not having elephants/ big cats in circuses is ok. People might be going along to the circus because it's closer than going to the zoo, not because they like to see animals performing.
Posted by Lucy on 29/05/2008 1:58:54 PM
How dare the lady Councillor admit she made her proposal WITHOUT TALKING TO THE CIRCUS PEOPLE? Without doing that, how did she gain her 'general knowledge'? Cllr Campbell is admitting to being one-sided; this decision is undemocratic. Here in the UK, an 18-month Governmental investigation has concluded that circuses are perfectly able to keep their animals as well as anybody else dealing with similar species. If Councillors are concerned, they should have the circus inspected; as things stand, they are dictating to the public without proper evidence. Shameful!
Posted by Chris Barltrop on 29/05/2008 6:29:06 PM
Animals in the circus are severely confined, deprived of normal physical and social behaviors, and forced to do meaningless, monotonous "tricks." It's exploitation. A near-consensus of elephant experts not affiliated with zoos or circuses agree that elephants should not be in either of those institutions. Elephants need to walk in order to be healthy and avoid crippling arthritis. They derive immense psychological benefit from being with a herd, exploring diverse terrain, and - basically - being able to make decisions for themselves. In a circus environment, where the animals spend most of their time in confinement or "performing" according to human whims, the animals essentially become brain-dead, and may develop learned hopelessness; they're denied the chance to make meaningful choices or affect their environment. I've talked with circus employees and read their propaganda. They say that the animals are happy and I firmly disagree. I've seen the chained elephants rocking incessantly back and forth to fight off boredom, if not madness. I've talked to the director of the Elephant Sanctuary in Tennessee, where the elephants roam freely instead of being loaded into trailers every three days, to be unloaded into another barren, featureless tent. The circus' defense of their exploitation is a foregone conclusion. They profit from it. Although I suspect with some imagination and creativity, they could put together programs without animals that are as entertaining and exciting as ever.
Posted by Gary on 30/05/2008 6:37:59 AM
I wish that so called councillors would act as fast on other serious matters in their electorate...Local goverment should be abolished, any uneducated, ill-informed person's can call themselves "Councillor's".what a joke re banning circus's, try looking after rate payers instead
Posted by Michael Robertson on 30/05/2008 1:22:51 PM
How dare the council ban these circuses without consulting the actual circues themselves. This is an outrage! There is nothing wrong with these circuses and to not even concult the owners is a disgrace!
Posted by Kyle on 6/06/2008 12:22:35 PM
1

Post A Comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Animal debate: Roarie the lion with his handler Matthew Ezekiel from Stardust Circus. Picture courtesy of ringmaster Adam St James
Animal debate: Roarie the lion with his handler Matthew Ezekiel from Stardust Circus. Picture courtesy of ringmaster Adam St James

21/08/2008 | The signs from Camden High - already a very successful school on the sporting field - look extremely bright.
100 Years of Scouting