Opinion 
 Blogs 
 Jaz says 
 Old school needs new tricks 

Old school needs new tricks

I was just reading a comment on the Advertiser's website about the new proposed development of the old Camden High School.

What I found blisteringly hilarious was the pseudonym ``here we go again'' given for the comment stating ``Bring on the Hysterical Society'' after recent criticisms of developments in Camden.

Granted this comment may offend people who think that the heritage of Camden will indeed be ruined by a very contemporary development, but surely its pure comic genius can be

appreciated... or maybe not?

Over the past year, we've seen a huge increase in people speaking out about what they want and (really) don't want in Camden, from the Islamic school to the uproar regarding Pat

Farmer's departure, and now this.

We don't like change much at all, it seems.

I can see why people might be against this development. At first I thought: ``No way, it would ruin the vibe of Camden.''

And to some extent I see how this plan might not fully incorporate the old world charm of Camden's architecture.

But come on - we really have to draw the line on how ``old school'' we want to remain. We cannot cloister ourselves from the developments of the rest of the world around us.

Let's face it. We're living in an increasingly globalised era when everything is so interconnected and technology is moving so much faster that we need to really step up.

Camden certainly is one beautiful town and I for one love the sweeping trees and the fact that doctors' surgeries are in heritage houses, but the area is growing and fast!

South-west Sydney is the fastest growing area in the state.

We need to not be so well, selfish.

Change is a necessary component of any town, of any city, of any country.

We simply cannot choose to restrict ourselves to living in a vacuum with no change and growth because - quite frankly - that's not an option we have. Change may not be loved but it can be embraced.

Our collective identity as residents of Camden will not change because of a development. We will grow bigger and stronger because of it.

So come on! Don't worry about the negatives and look forward to the grand possibilities.

Sometimes developments wreck a place. At other times they are feats of ingenuity and make a more dynamic community.

I guess we will have to wait and see.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

Comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Jaz I also think change is very important. I think it is just another step in life and the redevelopment of Camden High school will not just be a good addition to the community but will allow for a modern outlook on education in the area. (hopefully encouraging teens to think so also) I think that if the cafe's, parks and people dont change Camden will remain the great town it is.
Posted by Tara on 22/08/2008 5:07:17 PM
The population of south western Sydney will grow and residential development will and does need to happen. The old high school site is an obvious area for development. The question is more about what form this development takes. The current plan is for the area to be densely populated with 3 and 4 storey buildings which will be totally out of character with central Camden. Camden Council's own Town Centre Strategy limits the height of buildings to 2 and 3 storey. The developer of the site has argued that the 2 bedroom units built in the loft area of the buildings does not count as a 'storey', however the NSW Department of Planning's Residential Flat Design Code clearly states that a 'storey' includes'habitable rooms in the roof'. Camden will only get one chance to build something functional and attractive on the site. Lets not be fooled into thinking a high-rise conglomeration in the middle of town is a good thing, or that opposing this type of development is the same as being anti-development.
Posted by mt on 23/08/2008 12:43:14 PM
Debate has to be had about the direction in which development goes in Camden (and surrounds). Unfortunately, major DAs in the Camden LGA are displayed in the libraries and council offices which are closed over the weekends. Considering that 62% of employed persons work outside the Camden area, weekends are often the only time people would have to view them. Major DAs are tucked into folders and plans and illustrations at A1 size are unwieldy for dealing with when folded up. The minimum exhibition time only is allowed. All these hindrances diminishes community participation and feedback. Several other councils have much longer exhibition periods, have libraries open 7 days a week, prominently displayed graphics for DAs and highly navigable web-sites. I have worked as a Landscape Architect in the Government Architect's Office where community and stakeholder feedback was actively sought and after hours meetings were arranged when necessary. No design was presented as a fait accompli. Unfortunately, labelling groups (eg Hysterical society) turns the dialogue into a black and white, incredibly simplistic way of looking at the future direction for town and LGA development. Council has a responsibility to facilitate means of communicating major projects to the wider community, allowing feedback and discussion over a much longer time-frame. As noted above by mt there will only be one chance to build something functional and attractive in town - let's communicate and get it right.
Posted by Maryann Turner - Independent candidate - South Ward on 24/08/2008 10:56:22 PM
Jaz says
Jasmin Kelaita, 21, a proud ex-Elizabeth Macarthur High girl, is unafraid of expressing her opinion on what matters most to the youth of Camden.

Q: Plans to build homes and more on the old Camden High School site are:






20/11/2008 | There is something worse than having one GFC. That's having two.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...